| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb |
| Date: | 2006-01-25 15:32:34 |
| Message-ID: | 200601251632.35415.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> We have the same options with reindexdb, for example.
reindexdb and friends inherited that option from psql. On a green
field, they probably wouldn't have it. psql has more complex
semantics, so it's not clear whether that's the same thing.
> I think a command line options is better and required.
I think we need more proof of that than a use case involving taking
screen shots.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-25 16:18:44 | Re: Suggestions for post-mortem... |
| Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-01-25 15:26:53 | Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-25 16:28:04 | Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb |
| Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-01-25 15:26:53 | Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb |