Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Subject: Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug?
Date: 2006-01-24 15:59:27
Message-ID: 200601241659.28426.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2006 15:44 schrieb Stephen Frost:
> Have you got a suggestion on just how to fix it...? Debian's
> pg_upgradecluster bails out with an error when it discovers this
> situation but I don't think it'd be sensible for pg_dump to do that...

Why not? If the backup cannot be made in a way such that the semantics of the
restored database are the same, it shouldn't do it.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Slynko 2006-01-24 16:58:11 TODO item: locale per database patch (new iteration)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-01-24 15:42:17 Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug?