From: | "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow |
Date: | 2006-01-21 00:05:19 |
Message-ID: | 20060121000519.GA29755@uio.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 06:52:37PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's also worth considering that the entire approach is a heuristic,
> really --- getting the furthest-apart pair of seeds doesn't guarantee
> an optimal split as far as I can see. Maybe there's some totally
> different way to do it.
For those of us who don't know what tsearch2/gist is trying to accomplish
here, could you provide some pointers? :-) During my mini-literature-search
on Google, I've found various algorithms for locating clusters in
high-dimensional metric spaces[1]; some of it might be useful, but I might
just be misunderstanding what the real problem is.
[1] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/69/30435/01401892.pdf?arnumber=1401892 ,
for instance
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-21 00:23:10 | Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow |
Previous Message | SunWuKung | 2006-01-21 00:01:28 | Re: standard normal cumulative distribution function |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-21 00:23:10 | Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-20 23:52:37 | Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow |