From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stephan Vollmer <svollmer(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-performance(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow |
Date: | 2006-01-20 20:10:36 |
Message-ID: | 20060120201036.GE31908@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:14:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> [ thread moved to pgsql-performance ]
>
> I've obtained a gprof profile on Stephan's sample case (many thanks for
> providing the data, Stephan). The command is
<snip>
Something I'm missing is the calls to tsearch functions. I'm not 100%
familiar with gprof, but is it possible those costs have been added
somewhere else because it's in a shared library? Perhaps the costs went
into FunctionCall1/3?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-20 20:21:45 | Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-20 19:14:29 | Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-20 20:21:45 | Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow |
Previous Message | Rikard Pavelic | 2006-01-20 19:38:23 | Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures |