Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Larry Rosenman <lrosenman(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?
Date: 2006-01-20 17:01:35
Message-ID: 20060120170135.GD20182@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 07:16:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Larry Rosenman" <lrosenman(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> > I've got a fast FreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm on.
>
> > However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.
>
> > My questions are:
> > 1) do we need another one?
> > 2) if yes, what options need coverage?
>
> Looks like we're fairly well covered on freebsd already. Are you
> willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?

Out of curiosity, is there any benefit to improving SMP versus
single-proc coverage?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-01-20 17:20:05 Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement)
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-01-20 16:56:01 Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement)