From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomka Gergely <tomka(at)zeus(dot)gau(dot)hu> |
Cc: | psql performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: big databases & hospitals |
Date: | 2006-01-17 20:36:24 |
Message-ID: | 20060117203624.GC17896@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 01:13:02PM +0100, Tomka Gergely wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I need to write a few pages about Postgresql, to convince some suits. They
> have a few millions of records, on a few site, but they want to know the
> practical limits of Postgresql. So i need some information about the
> biggest (in storage space, in record number, in field number, and maybe
> table number) postgresql databases.
>
> Additionally, because this company develops hospital information systems,
> if someone knows about a medical institute, which uses Postgresql, and
> happy, please send me infomation. I only now subscribed to the advocacy
> list, and only started to browse the archives.
We have a customer that has around 5000 tables and hasn't had any
serious issues from that number of tables (other than \d sometimes not
working in psql, but IIRC Tom put a fix in for that already).
As for raw size, 100G databases are pretty common. If you search through
the list archives you can probably find some examples.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-01-17 20:40:44 | Re: Ensuring data integrity with fsync=off |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-17 20:19:31 | Re: Suspending SELECTs |