Re: [HACKERS] Docs off on ILIKE indexing?

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Docs off on ILIKE indexing?
Date: 2006-01-17 20:26:39
Message-ID: 20060117202639.GL67693@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 03:44:30PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/indexes-types.html
> > > says:
> > > The optimizer can also use a B-tree index for queries involving the
> > > pattern matching operators LIKE, ILIKE, ~, and ~*, if the
> > pattern is a
> > > constant and is anchored to the beginning of the string -
> > for example,
> > > col LIKE 'foo%' or col ~ '^foo', but not col LIKE '%bar'.
> >
> > > But really, does it use indexes for ILIKE?
> >
> > That's pretty poorly phrased. For ILIKE it'll only work if
> > there's a prefix of the pattern that's not letters (and hence
> > is unaffected by the case-folding issue).
>
> Ahh. That explains it. Perfectly logical.
> And yes, that's pretty poorly phrased - at least I didn't understand it
> :-)

I was going to submit a patch on this, and the best way seems to be
adding a note to 'ILIKE', specifying that it will only work if there's a
prefix to the pattern that isn't letters. Is there a standard way to tag
a word indicating that there's a note?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume LELARGE 2006-01-17 22:38:30 Patch for information_schema sgml file
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-01-17 17:34:28 Re: vacuum and routine maintenance docs

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-01-17 21:43:09 Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-01-17 19:41:20 Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement)