From: | Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Suspending SELECTs |
Date: | 2006-01-17 20:04:41 |
Message-ID: | 20060117200441.GB1408@mathom.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 08:56:00PM +0100, Alessandro Baretta wrote:
>I understand most of these issues, and expected this kind of reply. Please,
>allow me to insist that we reason on this problem and try to find a
>solution. My reason for doing so is that the future software industry is
>likely to see more and more web applications retrieving data from virtually
>endless databases, and in such contexts, it is sensible to ask the final
>client--the web client--to store the "cursor state", because web
>interaction is intrinsically asynchronous, and you cannot count on users
>logging out when they're done, releasing resources allocated to them. Think
>of Google.
I don't understand why it is better to rework the db instead of just
having the web middleware keep track of what cursors are associated with
what sessions?
Mike Stone
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alessandro Baretta | 2006-01-17 20:06:53 | Re: Suspending SELECTs |
Previous Message | Yantao Shi | 2006-01-17 20:00:37 | wildcard search performance with "like" |