| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Brendan Duddridge <brendan(at)clickspace(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Plans for 8.2? |
| Date: | 2006-01-16 22:30:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20060116223037.GM67693@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 05:30:49PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >Why would you only recommend Slony? How does it compare to Sequoia or
> >p/cluster?
>
> Well p/cluster is not OSS. Sequioa is but is query based and doesn't
> correctly deal with things like now().
>
> I was speaking directly about OSS replication.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but AFAIK Slony is the only OSS replication
that isn't statement based, which as Josh mentioned has some serious
ramifications.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-01-16 22:35:59 | Re: Plans for 8.2? |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-01-16 22:27:29 | Re: Unable to connect to a dabase |