From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue |
Date: | 2006-01-16 18:25:07 |
Message-ID: | 20060116182507.GD67693@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 04:13:56PM -0500, Qingqing Zhou wrote:
>
> "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> wrote
> >
> > I wonder if we should really implement file-system-cache-warmup strategy
> > which we have discussed before. There are two natural good places to do
> > this:
> >
> > (1) sequentail scan
> > (2) bitmap index scan
> >
>
> For the sake of memory, there is a third place a warm-up cache or pre-read
> is beneficial (OS won't help us):
> (3) xlog recovery
Wouldn't it be better to improve pre-reading data instead, ie, making
sure things like seqscan and bitmap scan always keep the IO system busy?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-01-16 18:26:43 | Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-01-16 18:21:52 | Re: source documentation tool doxygen |