From: | Alan Chandler <alan(at)chandlerfamily(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Another orderby problem |
Date: | 2006-01-14 13:02:48 |
Message-ID: | 200601141302.49630.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Just joined the list and have seen in the archive the thread on orderby. But
mine seems different.
I have a finanancial application with account and transactions which go
between accounts (source and destination) but in which one either can be
null.
I am attempting to read an account and sort all the transactions by date.
Here are the transactions
id | date | src | dst | description | amount
----+------------+-------+-------+---------------------------+--------
11 | 2005-06-05 | | Sarah | Sarah Petrol | 27.74
12 | 0005-06-05 | Sarah | | Ben 21st Birthday Pressie | -41
13 | 0005-06-05 | | Sarah | Cash from Mum | 60
14 | 0005-06-08 | | Sarah | Petrol | 27.33
15 | 0005-06-10 | | Sarah | Petrol Allowance | -40
This is the SQL
select name, id, transaction.date as tdate, description, -amount as amount
from account left join transaction on name=src where name = 'Sarah'
union
select name, id, transaction.date as tdate, description, amount
from account join transaction on name=dst where name ='Sarah'
order by tdate asc;
name | id | tdate | description | amount
-------+----+------------+---------------------------+--------
Sarah | 12 | 0005-06-05 | Ben 21st Birthday Pressie | 41
Sarah | 13 | 0005-06-05 | Cash from Mum | 60
Sarah | 14 | 0005-06-08 | Petrol | 27.33
Sarah | 15 | 0005-06-10 | Petrol Allowance | -40
Sarah | 11 | 2005-06-05 | Sarah Petrol | 27.74
(5 rows)
I can't figure out why the dates are not in order (see transaction 11 is out
of place).
for reference the transaction table has the "date" field of type "date"
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
Open Source. It's the difference between trust and antitrust.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | A. Kretschmer | 2006-01-14 13:09:02 | Re: Another orderby problem |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2006-01-13 16:20:11 | Re: ORDER BY does not work as expected with multiple joins |