Re: Plans for 8.2?

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: "H(dot)J(dot) Sanders" <hjs(at)rmax(dot)nl>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Plans for 8.2?
Date: 2006-01-13 21:59:47
Message-ID: 20060113215947.GA19342@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:40:48PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> It strikes me that if we had a way to abort a statement on another
> backend, you could abort anything that's been waiting more than x
> seconds for a lock via an external process watching pg_locks. Of course,
> that would be much more cumbersom than SET LOCK MODE TO WAIT n...

There's pg_cancel_backend(), but a mechanism like you describe seems
subject to race conditions: by the time you decide to cancel a query
and send the signal, the offending query might have completed and
you end up cancelling some subsequent query that just started.

--
Michael Fuhr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-01-13 22:14:16 Re: Plans for 8.2?
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-01-13 21:52:27 Re: Plans for 8.2?