Re: Plans for 8.2?

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Plans for 8.2?
Date: 2006-01-13 10:48:42
Message-ID: 20060113104840.GA5193@merkur.hilbert.loc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:46:18PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> > * Transaction was committed/aborted/crashed - we have to update pg_clog
> > * if transaction is still marked as running.
> > */
> > if (!TransactionIdDidCommit(xid) && !TransactionIdDidAbort(xid))
> > TransactionIdAbort(xid);
>
> The comment's "have to" is an overstatement. The transaction would be
> treated as crashed anyway, it's just that this is a convenient place to
> make pg_clog a bit cleaner. I'm not real sure why we bother, actually.

Because that's what makes PostgreSQL such a reliable
product. You follow your intuition and taste and bother
doing cleanup even if you cannot immediately tell whether
it's *really* needed.

Better safe than sorry. Not a bad idea for a database.

Karsten (who is storing clinical data in PostgreSQL)
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message surabhi.ahuja 2006-01-13 11:52:08 FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2006-01-13 08:59:19 Re: Plans for 8.2?