From: | "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working |
Date: | 2006-01-09 13:40:43 |
Message-ID: | 20060109133952.M36097@contactbda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan,
well that is good news, can you tell me what version of linux you are using and what gcc version also. I will let
Martin know.
Thanks
Jim
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: jim(at)contactbda(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:55:06 +0100
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working
> Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> > Hackers,
> >
> > I can confirm that HEAD does not initdb because of a SIGBUS as reported below by Martin Pitt @ debian (see his email
> > below). My build farm member (corgi) did pass all checks 6 days ago (I was having some issues with the build farm
> > code before that). If anyone would like to SSH into the box, please contact me via email and I will get an account
> > setup. Right now, I am trying to build 8.1 to see if it passes.
>
> I cannot confirm this - the mipsel box I have on the buildfarm
> (lionfish) seems to be happyily building all branches and completing
> make check.
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
------- End of Original Message -------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-01-09 14:03:28 | Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working |
Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2006-01-09 13:35:11 | Re: ISO 8601 Intervals |