| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: INSERT waiting under heavy load |
| Date: | 2006-01-08 18:21:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20060108182114.GA31582@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:49:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> performance risk in the sort of scenario you are describing.
> (I'm not sure why it would manifest as transactions showing "INSERT
> waiting" state though.)
It's because of I/O. When you have a large number of updates, the
planner always assumes an indexscan (correctly), but you end up
scanning megabytes of dead tuples. With a large number of open
transactions, most of the time VACUUM can't recover the space. I
agree with what Tom said earlier in this thread: the design is
guaranteed to lose.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
"The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying
November.
--H.W. Fowler
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mario Splivalo | 2006-01-09 01:22:49 | Re: Regular Expression Matching problem... |
| Previous Message | Frank Bax | 2006-01-07 20:47:58 | Re: how to transform list to table and evaluate an |