| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
| Date: | 2006-01-05 19:06:34 |
| Message-ID: | 200601051906.k05J6YQ03472@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > The following patch allows VIEW and SEQUENCE for GRANT. I didn't add
> > checks for relkind, figuring it wasn't worth it, right?
>
> The permissions for a sequence aren't the same as they are for a table.
> We've sort of ignored the point to date, but if we're going to add
> special syntax for granting on a sequence, I don't think we should
> continue to ignore it.
Uh, how are they different? You mean just UPDATE and none of the
others do anything?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-01-05 19:40:19 | Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-05 18:59:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-01-05 19:44:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-05 18:59:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |