From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
Date: | 2006-01-05 18:20:06 |
Message-ID: | 200601051820.k05IK6u26518@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Just got tripped up by this:
>
> GRANT SELECT ON table1 TO someuser;
> GRANT SELECT ON table1_id_seq TO someuser;
> .... both work
>
> However,
> GRANT SELECT ON TABLE table1 TO someuser;
> ... works, while ....
> GRANT SELECT ON SEQUENCE table1_id_seq TO someuser;
> ... raises an error.
>
> This is inconsistent. Do people agree with me that the parser should
> accept "SEQUENCE" there, since the optional object name works for all
> other objects? Is there some technical reason this is difficult to do?
The following patch allows VIEW and SEQUENCE for GRANT. I didn't add
checks for relkind, figuring it wasn't worth it, right?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 2.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-05 18:59:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-05 17:47:41 | Re: Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-05 18:59:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-05 17:47:41 | Re: Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |