Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message
Date: 2006-01-05 02:04:00
Message-ID: 200601042104.00984.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday 04 January 2006 20:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> A reasonable objection to either Plan A or Plan C is that it will add
> error strings that are not currently in the translation message files;
> which wouldn't matter for a HEAD-only patch, but I'd really like to
> back-patch this into 8.1. Plan B wouldn't change the set of possible
> messages.
>

No objections here but since I don't use a foreign lang I figure my vote
doesn't really matter. I was wondering though if it would be resonable to try
and get some language updates into the patch release?

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-01-05 02:10:36 Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-01-05 01:52:10 QNX mention in tuplesort.c