From: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
Date: | 2006-01-04 02:18:06 |
Message-ID: | 20060104021806.21032.qmail@web32713.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
--- Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> escreveu:
> However,
> GRANT SELECT ON TABLE table1 TO someuser;
> ... works, while ....
> GRANT SELECT ON SEQUENCE table1_id_seq TO someuser;
> ... raises an error.
>
> This is inconsistent. Do people agree with me that the parser
> should
> accept "SEQUENCE" there, since the optional object name works for all
>
> other objects? Is there some technical reason this is difficult to
> do?
>
It should but it's not implemented yet. There is no difficulty in doing
it. But I want to propose the following idea: if some object depends on
another object and its type is 'DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL' we could
grant/revoke privileges automagically to it. Or maybe create another
type of dependency to do so.
Comments?
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
euler[at]yahoo_com_br
_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage.
http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2006-01-04 02:20:43 | Re: Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX? |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2006-01-04 01:45:13 | Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-01-04 03:44:58 | TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-01-04 01:19:41 | Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |