| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, kleptog(at)svana(dot)org, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu, pg(at)rbt(dot)ca, zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and |
| Date: | 2006-01-03 16:55:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20060103165515.GQ6026@ns.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Jim C. Nasby (jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com) wrote:
> Yeah, I hadn't thought about that. I agree; if you trust some process
> enough to have MVCC-affecting rights then you should be able to trust it
> with full ownership rights.
About that, I have to disagree. :) I've got a case where this isn't
true, see my other post please. Giving someone truncate rights is
*very* different from allowing them to drop a table or change the
definition of the table.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-03 17:08:05 | Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2006-01-03 16:54:01 | Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? |