From: | "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? |
Date: | 2006-01-02 19:14:42 |
Message-ID: | 20060102191412.M3041@contactbda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
On corgi (debian sarge)
raq:~# bison -V
bison (GNU Bison) 1.875a
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Sent: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 12:54:42 -0500
Subject: [HACKERS] What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines?
> Is there any way to find out $subject? I see that several of the
> buildfarm machines are choking on a patch I committed yesterday:
>
> guc-file.l: In function `ProcessConfigFile':
> guc-file.l:162: error: `YY_FLUSH_BUFFER' undeclared (first use in this function)
> guc-file.l:162: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> guc-file.l:162: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[4]: *** [guc.o] Error 1
>
> YY_FLUSH_BUFFER is documented as a standard macro in bison 1.875, which
> is the oldest version we officially support. But I'm prepared to change
> it if there is another way that would work with a wider range of bison
> versions.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
------- End of Original Message -------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-01-02 19:21:55 | Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-02 19:13:47 | Re: Stats collector performance improvement |