| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | jmurtari(at)thebook(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch set under development to add usage reporting. |
| Date: | 2009-10-31 18:59:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20059.1257015598@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On lr, 2009-10-31 at 13:37 -0400, John Murtari wrote:
>> ... We also had
>> developed the "SHOW STATISTICS" syntax for DB version that don't
>> support INFORMATION SCHEMA.
> I don't really get the point of the SHOW STATISTICS command. There is
> already a command whose purpose is to retrieve data in tabular form,
> namely SELECT.
I presume we need not worry about that, since the SQL committee are
certainly not going to standardize something that's only there for
DBs that don't support information_schema.
Actually, the idea of standardizing anything at all in this area seems
pretty bogus. The events that are interesting to measure are below the
semantic level of the standard --- for instance, how are you going to
count index searches, when the standard doesn't even recognize the
existence of indexes? Let alone things like buffer cache hits, which is
a concept that might not exist at all in some implementations. I think
we can safely assume that the proposed standardization effort will go
nowhere, and just look at whether this is interesting for Postgres.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-10-31 19:27:39 | Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-10-31 18:47:34 | Re: Patch set under development to add usage reporting. |