| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: message clarifications |
| Date: | 2010-04-06 14:13:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20056.1270563228@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 09:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Or use errmsg_internal instead of errmsg.
> I've changed them to elog() before you said this. Would you like me to
> change them to errmsg_internal or do you mean "...as an option in the
> future"?
It's just a different option. elog for debug messages is a well
established practice, but if you wanted something that looked more
like ereport, you could hide the messages from translation with
the above.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-06 14:28:56 | Re: SELECT constant; takes 15x longer on 9.0? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-06 14:11:56 | Re: message clarifications |