Re: 7.3 TODO

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.3 TODO
Date: 2002-08-21 14:10:57
Message-ID: 20052.1029939057@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Has anyone made a decision about the SET LOCAL needing to be changed to SET
> TRANSATION for SQL compatibiltity?

I think we had decided not to; IIRC the argument that spelling it
TRANSACTION would be more spec-compatible looked bogus on closer
inspection.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • 7.3 TODO at 2002-08-21 08:18:12 from Christopher Kings-Lynne

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-21 14:14:40 Re: CVS broken - large file support?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-21 14:02:54 Re: Dropping a schema