Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1?

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1?
Date: 2005-12-27 19:05:16
Message-ID: 20051227190516.GB6811@mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:50:16AM -0500, Ron wrote:
>Sorry. A decade+ RWE in production with RAID 5 using controllers as
>bad as Adaptec and as good as Mylex, Chaparral, LSI Logic (including
>their Engino stuff), and Xyratex under 5 different OS's (Sun, Linux,
>M$, DEC, HP) on each of Oracle, SQL Server, DB2, mySQL, and pg shows
>that RAID 5 writes are slower than RAID 5 reads

What does that have to do with anything? That wasn't the question...

>RAID 5 is not a silver bullet.

Who said it was? Nothing is, not even RAID 10. The appropriate thing to
do is to make decisions based on requirements, not to make sweeping
statements that eliminate entire categories of solutions based on hand
waving.

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luke Lonergan 2005-12-27 19:18:19 Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1?
Previous Message Frank Wiles 2005-12-27 18:56:56 Re: Performance problems with 8.1.1 compared to 7.4.7