From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup |
Date: | 2005-12-27 12:50:14 |
Message-ID: | 200512271350.14865.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Am Montag, 26. Dezember 2005 20:46 schrieb Heikki Linnakangas:
> FWIW, I believe "log archival" is a common term for that.
I like that better, although there are a lot of logs, so maybe "transaction
log archival".
Considering the list originally referenced:
- File system backup
- SQL dump
- (Transaction log archival?)
This addresses the technical workings of the various backup systems. The fact
that it is or isn't on-line, hot, continuous, fast, or flexible is secondary.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-27 17:45:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2005-12-26 19:46:44 | Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-12-27 13:29:46 | Proposed COLLATE implementation |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-12-27 12:17:42 | Handling of build-time enabled GUC settings |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-27 14:51:08 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2114: (patch) COPY FROM ... end of copy |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-12-27 08:29:35 | list of scalars for fors and fore stms II |