From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: default resource limits |
Date: | 2005-12-24 11:22:31 |
Message-ID: | 200512241222.31677.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Am Samstag, 24. Dezember 2005 00:20 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> The rationale is one connection per apache thread (which on Windows
> defaults to 400). If people think this is too many I could live with
> winding it back a bit - the defaults number of apache workers on Unix is
> 250, IIRC.
It's 150. I don't mind increasing the current 100 to 150, although I find
tying this to apache pretty bogus.
I really don't like the prospect of making the defaults platform specific,
especially if the only rationale for that would be "apache does it". Why
does apache allocate more connections on Windows anyway?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-12-24 11:25:41 | Re: Fixing row comparison semantics |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-12-24 10:46:29 | Re: Fixing row comparison semantics |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-12-24 14:17:06 | Re: default resource limits |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2005-12-24 00:27:23 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2120: Crash when doing UTF8<->ISO_8859_8 |