Re: view or index to optimize performance

From: Klein Balázs <Balazs(dot)Klein(at)axelero(dot)hu>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: view or index to optimize performance
Date: 2005-12-22 23:42:56
Message-ID: 20051222234307.5E491202E86D@graveyard2.mail.t-online.hu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

thanks for the help

>What you could do is partition the table so that critical information is
>stored in a smaller table while everything else goes to a larger table.

I was thinking the other way round - maybe I can split the large table by
creating a materialized view. But than I read that it is maybe unnecessary
to create a materialized view because pg

"Materialized views sound a useful workaround, if your database doesn't have
a query cache. If you do have a query cache, then you already effectively
have eager or lazy materialized views (depending on your isolation level):
Just use your normal view (or query) and let the database figure it out."
Quote from Farce Pest in
http://spyced.blogspot.com/2005/05/materialized-views-in-postgresql.html

But later in the same blog it seems to indicate that there is a choice to
either use or not use the query cache of pg.

So I don't know now how this cache works and whether it could help me in
this.

SWK

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Carlos Moreno 2005-12-22 23:45:51 Re: Why is create function bringing down the Backend server?
Previous Message John Sidney-Woollett 2005-12-22 22:32:23 Re: [Slony1-general] Mem usage/leak - advice needed