From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Madison Kelly <linux(at)alteeve(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: MySQL is faster than PgSQL but a large margin in my program... any ideas why? |
Date: | 2005-12-22 02:14:18 |
Message-ID: | 20051222021418.GB6026@ns.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
* Madison Kelly (linux(at)alteeve(dot)com) wrote:
> If the performace difference comes from the 'COPY...' command being
> slower because of the automatic quoting can I somehow tell PostgreSQL
> that the data is pre-quoted? Could the performance difference be
> something else?
I doubt the issue is with the COPY command being slower than INSERTs
(I'd expect the opposite generally, actually...). What's the table type
of the MySQL tables? Is it MyISAM or InnoDB (I think those are the main
alternatives)? IIRC, MyISAM doesn't do ACID and isn't transaction safe,
and has problems with data reliability (aiui, equivilant to doing 'fsync
= false' for Postgres). InnoDB, again iirc, is transaction safe and
whatnot, and more akin to the default PostgreSQL setup.
I expect some others will comment along these lines too, if my response
isn't entirely clear. :)
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Brown | 2005-12-22 02:44:53 | Re: MySQL is faster than PgSQL but a large margin in my program... any ideas why? |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-12-22 02:13:46 | Re: Speed of different procedural language |