From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pierre Girard <pierre(dot)girard(at)gerad(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] Solaris cc compiler on amd: PostgreSQL does not |
Date: | 2005-12-20 18:42:17 |
Message-ID: | 20051220184217.GZ28771@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 04:59:45PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Looking before that, the 64-bit registers are now prefixed with 'r'
> > > instead of 'e', so what I did was to convert all the long/l assembler
> > > instructions to quad/64-bit/q, and rename the registers to use 64-bit
> > > versions. I also modified the function alignment from 4 to 8, patch
> > > attached. Please give it a try and report back any error lines.
> >
> > Surely that breaks it for the i386 case --- don't we need a separate
> > solaris_x86_64.s source file?
>
> Yes, it is only for him to test. But his email bounced back so it is
> possible he isn't going to be back. :-(
Sorry, I don't remember the history of this thread, but I do have access
to solaris on an opteron if something needs to be tested.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Pitt | 2005-12-20 20:23:09 | Re: horology regression test failure |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-20 17:49:38 | Re: horology regression test failure |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Pitt | 2005-12-20 20:23:09 | Re: horology regression test failure |
Previous Message | Rick Gigger | 2005-12-20 18:08:48 | Re: Automatic function replanning |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-12-20 18:47:27 | Re: COPY LOCK for WAL bypass |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-20 17:44:35 | Re: Disparity in search_path SHOW and SET |