Re: One DB not backed up by pg_dumpall

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: One DB not backed up by pg_dumpall
Date: 2005-12-19 05:48:40
Message-ID: 20051219054840.GA90475@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 11:29:13PM -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Any reason why a database would not get dumped by pg_dumpall?
> Always run pg_dumpall as the superuser.

As the operating system superuser or as a database superuser?
There's a difference.

> I do a nightly dump and have checked several days so far and the database
> is missing in all so far. :-(

Is this a new procedure that has never worked, or is it an old
procedure with a new problem?

> The only thing, for that DB, that got backed up was the database, but not a
> single table. So far from what I see other DBs were restored ok (At least
> the ones I have checked so far).

What are the exact commands you're using to dump and restore? Have
you examined the output and the server's logs for errors and warnings?

--
Michael Fuhr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-12-19 06:01:22 Re: Select list of table names for particular DB
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-12-19 05:24:55 Re: sequence rollback?