| From: | Juan Casero <caseroj(at)comcast(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1 |
| Date: | 2005-12-18 16:35:15 |
| Message-ID: | 200512181135.15202.caseroj@comcast.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi -
Can anyone tell me how well PostgreSQL 8.x performs on the new Sun Ultrasparc
T1 processor and architecture on Solaris 10? I have a custom built retail
sales reporting that I developed using PostgreSQL 7.48 and PHP on a Fedora
Core 3 intel box. I want to scale this application upwards to handle a
database that might grow to a 100 GB. Our company is green mission conscious
now so I was hoping I could use that to convince management to consider a Sun
Ultrasparc T1 or T2 system provided that if I can get the best performance
out of it on PostgreSQL. So will newer versions of PostgreSQL (8.1.x) be
able to take of advantage of the multiple cores on a T1 or T2? I cannot
change the database and this will be a hard sell unless I can convince them
that the performance advantages are too good to pass up. The company is
moving in the Win32 direction and so I have to provide rock solid reasons for
why I want to use Solaris Sparc on a T1 or T2 server for this database
application instead of Windows on SQL Server.
Thanks,
Juan
-------------------------------------------------------
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Petrilli | 2005-12-18 17:12:41 | Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-12-18 13:48:52 | Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex |