| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pål Stenslet <paal(dot)stenslet(at)exie(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex |
| Date: | 2005-12-17 19:03:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200512171903.jBHJ3sH02565@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Added to TODO:
> > * Allow star join optimizations
>
> See my response to Simon for reasons why this doesn't seem like a
> particularly good TODO item.
Yes, TODO removed. I thought we were waiting for bitmap joins before
trying star joins. I did not realize they might never be a win.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2005-12-17 19:05:27 | Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-17 18:47:07 | Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex |