Re: Installation trouble - Solved

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Weberhofer GmbH <office(at)weberhofer(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com
Subject: Re: Installation trouble - Solved
Date: 2005-12-17 17:28:00
Message-ID: 200512171728.jBHHS0D11633@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >This patch should be sent to SuSE, not PostgreSQL.
> >
> >
>
> Actually, I think this should be incoporated into a spec file
> specifically for suse within the PGDG rpms.

The PostgreSQL Global Development Group has official RPMs? I didn't
know. When Lamar did it it was always unofficial.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-12-17 17:36:38 Re: Installation trouble - Solved
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-17 17:26:54 Re: is this a bug or I am blind?