From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Gregory S(dot) Williamson" <gsw(at)globexplorer(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: outdated (bad) information in pg_stat_activity |
Date: | 2005-12-15 22:53:11 |
Message-ID: | 20051215225311.GL40699@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 02:02:02PM -0800, Gregory S. Williamson wrote:
> I too have had issues with "stuck" entries in the pg_stat_activity view -- the real pid is long gone but postgres still thinks the process is there.
>
> It would be real sweet to have a way of cleaning this table with bringing postgres off-line.
Rather than trying to clean things up by hand, could the stats system
instead periodically check to make sure that all the PIDs it knows about
actually still exist? I think that should be a pretty cheap check to
perform...
> Greg Williamson
> DBA
> GlobeXplorer LLC
On a side note, is GlobeXplorer using PostgreSQL? Would they be willing
to let us publicize that fact? Better yet, would they be willing to do a
case study?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-12-15 23:13:55 | Re: is this a bug or I am blind? |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-12-15 22:43:02 | Re: Timestamp <-> ctime conversion question ... |