Re: PL/pgSQL : notion of deferred execution

From: Frank van Vugt <ftm(dot)van(dot)vugt(at)foxi(dot)nl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL : notion of deferred execution
Date: 2005-12-12 16:16:01
Message-ID: 200512121716.02513.ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> After reading the explanation, this seems way too specialized a
> situation to make a good argument that we need a general feature
> of the sort.

Ok, however, thanks for your time on it, anyway!

> You can get to where you need to be by passing an indicator in
> the trigger arguments

Argh, it's always the simple stuff ;)

Had been overlooking TG_ARGV[] here, that should prove to be a nice
compromise, thanks for the hint!

--
Best,

Frank.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rich Doughty 2005-12-12 16:31:10 View with an outer join - is there any way to optimise this?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-12 15:29:28 Re: PL/pgSQL : notion of deferred execution