| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: initdb detecting date order |
| Date: | 2005-12-09 03:28:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200512090328.jB93SaK10447@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Er, is that really a good idea? It will make it impossible to
> > document what the "default" behavior is;
>
> I think a localized default behavior is more important than a fixed
> default behavior for everyone. We already adjust the locales and
> encodings in initdb and this is just a natural extension of that theme.
> No robust application will rely on the default setting anyway; if you
> want to be sure you have to set it or at least query it anyway.
Agreed. It seems like a logical extension to what we already do.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-09 03:29:45 | Re: initdb detecting date order |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-12-09 03:03:35 | Re: initdb detecting date order |