From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? |
Date: | 2005-12-07 02:53:37 |
Message-ID: | 20051207025337.GA61048@winnie.fuhr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 10:47:45AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Ok, and what does this give:
>
> SELECT EXTRACT(MICROSECOND FROM '2003-01-02 10:30:01.00123');
mysql> SELECT EXTRACT(MICROSECOND FROM '2003-01-02 10:30:01.00123');
+-------------------------------------------------------+
| EXTRACT(MICROSECOND FROM '2003-01-02 10:30:01.00123') |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
| 1230 |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Does contrary behavior from MySQL count as evidence that PostgreSQL's
behavior is correct? :-)
--
Michael Fuhr
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-12-07 03:03:13 | Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-12-07 02:47:45 | Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? |