| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2 |
| Date: | 2005-12-07 00:57:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20051207005711.GW16053@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:36:19PM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On 6/12/05 5:16 pm, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Well, unfortunately no spec document ever came out of dicussion on this list.
>
> I've never seen a spec document produced for anything that postgresql.org
> has done, on the web side or the backend server. I'm sure some (maybe all)
> of the companies involved might produce them for things they work on, but I
> never saw anything on -hackers.
This is something that may end up changing over time. Companies
generally want to know how large a project is going to be (read as: what
it's going to cost) before they commit to it, and that generally means
having both some kind of requirements doc and design doc.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-12-07 01:02:09 | Re: Integration Requirements |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-12-07 00:31:32 | Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2 |