| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "C(dot) Filipe Medeiros" <filipe(at)mercenary3(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text Search |
| Date: | 2005-12-05 22:16:27 |
| Message-ID: | 200512052316.27463.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Am Montag, 5. Dezember 2005 20:09 schrieb C. Filipe Medeiros:
> I think a major step that the development community behind Pgsql
> could take to advance the project would be to take Tsearch2 or OpenFTS
> and make one of them (I prefer the Tsearch2 architecture, but then I
> haven't used OpenFTS in a while) native to Postgres rather than a contrib.
This is certainly a completely misguided solution to your problem. Imagine
what software packages like Linux, Perl, or Apache would look like today if
the response to every "my hoster has not installed module X" had been "let's
put X in the core distribution". One could certainly argue about the merits
of full-text search in particular, but that will only postpone your real
problem until next week.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-12-05 22:41:37 | Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text |
| Previous Message | C. Filipe Medeiros | 2005-12-05 19:09:20 | First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text Search |