| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
| Date: | 2005-12-03 14:48:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200512031548.58240.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-ports |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > They are called "Readline" and "Libedit".
>
> I wanted to distinguish libreadline from readline-functionality.
The functionality may be called "command-line editing" but I don't see
how that relates to what actually appears in the patch.
> Why is it Readline?
PostgreSQL was already used.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mario Weilguni | 2005-12-03 14:53:35 | Strange left join problems in 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-12-03 13:47:36 | Re: Reducing relation locking overhead |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-03 14:53:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
| Previous Message | Nicolai Tufar | 2005-12-03 13:18:09 | snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-03 14:53:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-03 13:01:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |