From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Date: | 2005-12-03 15:27:37 |
Message-ID: | 200512031527.jB3FRbX08195@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-ports |
Michael Paesold wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I wanted to distinguish libreadline from readline-functionality. Why is
> > it Readline?
>
> "The GNU Readline Library" is usually referred to as "Readline", not
> "libreadline". The offical name for "libedit" is really "Libedit".
>
> See e.g.:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/libedit/
> http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/readline/rltop.html
>
> IMHO libreadline does not sound good.
OK, I call it GNU Readline now:
--with-bonjour build with Bonjour support
--with-openssl build with OpenSSL support
--with-libedit-preferred prefer BSD Libedit over GNU Readline
--without-readline do not use GNU Readline / BSD Libedit line editing
--without-zlib do not use Zlib
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 11.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Esha Palta | 2005-12-03 15:47:18 | unsubscribe |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-12-03 15:23:06 | Re: Reducing relation locking overhead |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-03 16:16:03 | Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows |
Previous Message | Michael Paesold | 2005-12-03 15:14:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-04 03:52:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Previous Message | Michael Paesold | 2005-12-03 15:14:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |