Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date: 2005-12-03 11:11:40
Message-ID: 200512031211.42338.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-ports

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > In any case please be consistent about the capitalization ...
>
> OK, updated text:
>
> --with-openssl build with OpenSSL support
> --with-libedit-preferred prefer Libedit over Libreadline
> --without-readline do not use Libreadline/Libedit line editing
> --without-zlib do not use Zlib

They are called "Readline" and "Libedit".

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-12-03 11:17:46 Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits
Previous Message Philip Warner 2005-12-03 11:06:40 Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-12-03 11:17:46 Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-12-03 06:19:26 Re: Add function to return the thread safety status of libpq

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-03 13:01:19 Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-12-02 20:27:41 Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?