Re: Database restore speed

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Database restore speed
Date: 2005-12-02 21:46:02
Message-ID: 20051202214602.GH7330@mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:24:31PM -0800, Luke Lonergan wrote:
>From a performance standpoint no argument, although you're betting that you
>can do parsing / conversion faster than the COPY core in the backend can

Not necessarily; you may be betting that it's more *efficient* to do the
parsing on a bunch of lightly loaded clients than your server. Even if
you're using the same code this may be a big win.

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Reyes 2005-12-02 23:00:53 Re: 15,000 tables
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2005-12-02 21:29:47 Re: Database restore speed