| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. | 
| Date: | 2005-12-01 21:00:15 | 
| Message-ID: | 200512012100.jB1L0FS26208@candle.pha.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers | 
Tom Lane wrote:
> momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > Add comments about why errno is set to zero.
> 
> These comments seem a bit wrongheaded, since "checking
> LONG_MIN/LONG_MAX" is exactly not what we could do to detect an overflow
> error.
Yea, I noticed the 0 was listed as another value that needs to be
checked.  Should I just change them all to:
errno = 0; /* avoid checking result for failure */
or should I add a macro to c.h as:
	/* Sometimes we need to clear errno so we can check errno
	 * without having to check for a failure value from the function
	 * call.
	 */	
	#define CLEAR_ERRNO \\
	do { \
		errno = 0; \\
	while (0);
-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-01 21:06:20 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-01 20:53:34 | Re: pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. | 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-01 21:01:34 | Re: generalizing the planner knobs | 
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-12-01 20:54:42 | Re: generalizing the planner knobs |