Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Tyler MacDonald <tyler(at)yi(dot)org>, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen(dot)wiedmann(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul DuBois <paul(at)snake(dot)net>, dbi-users(at)perl(dot)org, perl(at)lists(dot)mysql(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
Date: 2005-12-01 12:45:38
Message-ID: 20051201124538.GD31915@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 02:58:15PM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
>
> Shouldn't that be 8.0 and later? That's when savepoints were
> introduced. Or are you referring to something else?

Doh. Indeed. I was _thinking_ os something else, but not referring
to something else.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
A certain description of men are for getting out of debt, yet are
against all taxes for raising money to pay it off.
--Alexander Hamilton

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message &ru 2005-12-01 13:15:39 number of dimensions of a multi-dimensional array
Previous Message John D. Burger 2005-12-01 12:43:49 Re: Finding uniques across a big join