From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB |
Date: | 2005-11-27 15:55:15 |
Message-ID: | 200511271055.15924.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 14:50, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> I case people on this list have not seen the slashdot discussion
> (http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/23/0228258&tid=221&tid
>=218), it appears that MySQL has announced a commitment to provide a
> replacement to InnoDB to their customers. I wanted to just fill in a
> few gaps that came up during my research.
<snip>
>
> So my conclusion is that MySQL is biting off quite a bit with this
> commitment. One really does not know how long it would take them to
> create such a table architecture froms scratch or indeed whether they
> are able to if they try.
>
If only there was another open source database that used mvcc that was
bsd-licensed, then they could use that as a starting point and have the
control over it that they want.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-11-28 21:30:11 | Change in authentication for @postgresql.org addresses |
Previous Message | bostic | 2005-11-26 17:32:30 | Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB |