Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1
Date: 2005-11-17 13:53:31
Message-ID: 20051117135329.GE22933@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 12:01:31AM +1100, John Hansen wrote:
> On a fresh installation of postgrsql 8.1 if you drop the
> 'postgres' database,
> psql, createdb, etc. no longer works.
>
> psql -l; ignores -dtemplate1, and createdb doesn't have such an option.

What distribution? I've never seen this "postgres" database you speak
of. It certainly not on any systems I've used. Do you have a PGDATABASE
variable in your environment?

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2005-11-17 14:08:22 Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1
Previous Message John Hansen 2005-11-17 13:01:31 Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1