From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marcus Engene <mengpg(at)engene(dot)se> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: bind variables, soft vs hard parse |
Date: | 2005-11-16 03:52:21 |
Message-ID: | 20051116035221.GH44860@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
PostgreSQL combines both parses into one, so every new query is
effectively a hard parse (unless it's prepared, then there is no parse
or optimization at all).
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 07:33:46PM +0100, Marcus Engene wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> I've mostly used Oracle in the past, but for a web-project I took the
> opportunity to try Postgres.
>
> When a select is done in Oracle, it first checks if the select is cached
> (ie parsed tree, optimizer choices & such). It does this by
> [functionality equal to] a byte to byte compare with the other sql strings.
>
> select a from b where c = 1
> select a from b where c = 2
>
> ...will thus force a hard parse on the second select. But if using bind
> variables it wont as the string stored is something like
>
> select a from b where c = ?
>
> Which will be the same as the second call. There is quite a big
> difference in performance using bind variables.
>
> Does Postgres work the same? Where can I go for more info?
>
> Oracle recently gave some money to Zend to make proper Oracle support
> for PHP. In that interface they use bind variables. Apart from greater
> speed, sqlinjection becomes history as well.
>
> Best regards,
> Marcus
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-11-16 04:04:11 | Re: MERGE vs REPLACE |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-11-16 03:40:48 | OS X 7.4 failure |