From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Crash during elog.c... |
Date: | 2005-11-07 19:58:15 |
Message-ID: | 20051107195815.GD19551@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:06:39PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> > My client (same one with the slru.c issue) has had 3 of these in the
> > past day...
>
> > (gdb) print *str
> > $39 = {data = 0x848030 "2005-11-04 00:01:02 EST|2005-11-04 00:00:08 EST|216.187.113.78(39476)|didit|", len = 76,
> > maxlen = 256, cursor = 0}
>
> Um, what's your log_line_prefix setting, and is the next format code
> %i by any chance? I've just noticed an utterly brain-dead assumption
> somebody stuck into ps_status.c awhile back.
log_line_prefix = '%t|%s|%r|%d|%i|%p'
So yeah, looks like %i is next. I recall seeing something about %i in
the backtrace or something else related to this, but I can't find it
now.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Maxwell | 2005-11-07 20:07:15 | Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems |
Previous Message | Mark Cave-Ayland | 2005-11-07 19:44:14 | Any advice about function caching? |